49 Million to 5

The following article is brilliant both for its exposure of the hypocrisy of the pro-abortion movement (and relatively free pass given to Muslim terrorists) as well as its detailing of the evil practices of George Tiller, the late, late-term abortionist and his political accomplices. Though I wrote recently that “Murder is Always a Wrong Moral Choice,” Ann puts in perspective who has committed the most murders over the past forty years. The mind-boggling answer is in the title. After you read the article, read the title again and let it sink in.

This insightful column reminds me of the same lies and hypocrisy that surround the treatment of the Puritans in contemporary literature. We’re led to believe that the Puritans (those bigoted Bible-believing Christians) were cruel and evil. They killed witches in Salem in 1692.  Well, I researched that subject a few years ago and found that that exactly seventeen persons were killed during the witch trials. That was wrong. It was too harsh a punishment for the crime. But it was seventeen people.

Since 1972, the pro-abortionists have killed 49 million innocent children. The score there is 49 million to 17. So who are the evil ones?  Who are really the mass murderers? Do the math and make the call. Don’t let historical revisionism blur your vision.

I don’t always agree with Ann Coulter’s comments or demeanor. But I agree 100% with her piercing analysis of this issue of life and death. No one has said it better. I read this articles three times to let it sink in. I encourage you to do the same. RB

By Ann Coulter

In the wake of the shooting of late-term abortionist George Tiller, President Barack Obama sent out a welcome message that this nation would not tolerate attacks on pro-lifers or any other Americans because of their religion or beliefs

Ha ha! Just kidding. That was the lead sentence — with minor edits — of a New York Times editorial warning about theoretical hate crimes against Muslims published eight months after 9/11. Can pro-lifers get a hate crimes bill passed and oceans of ink devoted to assuring Americans that “most pro-lifers are peaceful”?

For years, we’ve had to hear about the grave threat that Americans might overreact to a terrorist attack committed by 19 Muslims shouting “Allahu akbar” as they flew commercial jets into American skyscrapers. That would be the equivalent of 19 pro-lifers shouting “Abortion kills a beating heart!” as they gunned down thousands of innocent citizens in Wichita, Kan.  Why aren’t liberals rushing to assure us this time that “most pro-lifers are peaceful”? Unlike Muslims, pro-lifers actually are peaceful.

According to recent polling, a majority of Americans oppose abortion — which is consistent with liberals’ hysterical refusal to allow us to vote on the subject. In a country with approximately 150 million pro-lifers, five abortionists have been killed since Roe v. Wade.

In that same 36 years, more than 49 million babies have been killed by abortionists. Let’s recap that halftime score, sports fans: 49 million to five.

Meanwhile, fewer than 2 million Muslims live in America and, while Muslims are less murderous than abortionists, I’m fairly certain they’ve killed more than five people in the United States in the last 36 years. For some reason, the number “3,000” keeps popping into my head.

So in a country that is more than 50 percent pro-life — and 80 percent opposed to the late-term abortions of the sort performed by Tiller — only five abortionists have been killed. And in a country that is less than 0.5 percent Muslim, several dozen Muslims have killed thousands of Americans.

But the killing of about one abortionist per decade leads liberals to condemn the entire pro-life movement as “domestic terrorists.” At least liberals have finally found some terrorists they’d like to send to Guantanamo.

Tiller bragged about performing 60,000 abortions, including abortions of viable babies, able to survive outside the mother’s womb. He made millions of dollars performing late-term abortions so gruesome that only two other abortionists — not a squeamish bunch — in the entire country would perform them.

Kansas law allows late-term abortions only to save the mother’s life or to prevent “irreversible physical damage” to the mother. But Tiller was more than happy to kill viable babies, provided the mothers: (1) forked over $5,000; and (2) mentioned “substantial and irreversible conditions,” which, in Tiller’s view, apparently included not being able to go to concerts or rodeos or being “temporarily depressed” on account of their pregnancies.

In return for blood money from Tiller’s profitable abattoir, Democrats ran a political protection racket for the late-term abortionist.

In 1997, The Washington Post reported that Tiller attended one of Bill Clinton’s White House coffees for major campaign contributors. In addition to a $25,000 donation to Clinton, Tiller wanted to thank him personally for 30 months of U.S. Marshals’ protection paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

Kansas Democrats who received hundreds of thousands of campaign dollars from Tiller repeatedly intervened to block any interference with Tiller’s abortion mill.

Kathleen Sebelius, who was the governor of Kansas until Obama made her Health and Human Services Secretary, received hundreds of thousands of campaign dollars from Tiller. Sebelius vetoed one bill restricting late-term abortions and another one that would have required Tiller to turn over his records pertaining to “substantial and irreversible conditions” justifying his late-term abortions.

Kansas Attorney General Paul Morrison also got elected with the help of Tiller’s blood money, replacing a Republican attorney general who was in the middle of an investigation of Tiller for various crimes including his failure to report statutory rapes, despite performing abortions on pregnant girls as young as 11.

But soon after Morrison replaced the Republican attorney general, the charges against Tiller were reduced and, in short order, he was acquitted of a few misdemeanors. In what is a not uncommon cost of doing business with Democrats, Morrison is now gone, having been forced to resign when his mistress charged him with sexual harassment and corruption.

Tiller was protected not only by a praetorian guard of elected Democrats, but also by the protective coloration of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America — coincidentally, the same church belonged to by Tiller’s fellow Wichita executioner, the BTK killer.

The official Web page of the ELCA instructs: “A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born.” As long as we’re deciding who does and doesn’t have an “absolute right to be born,” who’s to say late-term abortionists have an “absolute right” to live?

I wouldn’t kill an abortionist myself, but I wouldn’t want to impose my moral values on others. No one is for shooting abortionists. But how will criminalizing men making difficult, often tragic, decisions be an effective means of achieving the goal of reducing the shootings of abortionists?

Following the moral precepts of liberals, I believe the correct position is: If you don’t believe in shooting abortionists, then don’t shoot one.

Murder is Always a Wrong Moral Choice

I’m sure you’ve heard by now that Dr. George Tiller, the most well-known partial birth abortion doctor in America, was shot and killed Sunday in a church in Wichita, Kansas. The gunman fled after the crime, but a 51-year-old suspect, Scott Roeder, was detained some 170 miles away in suburban Kansas City three hours after the shooting. It is assumed that he will be charged with murder.

He should be. Murder is always a wrong moral choice.

Despite whatever motives are forthcoming in the circumstances of the shooting, murder is murder. At the present time, abortion is legal in America–even the gruesome abortions that Dr. Tiller performed on late-term pregnancies. George Tiller was a human being, made in the image of God, with an inalienable right to life. In the eyes of the law of the United States, Dr. Tiller was also an innocent man who was maliciously killed. His death was horrific and wrong, and we should be saddened and outraged.

Those of us who are pro-life are always pro-life when it comes to murder.

Speaking for the pro-life side of the debate, Focus on the Family founder James C. Dobson, issued the following statement Sunday on the slaying of late-term abortionist George Tiller:

“We are shocked by the murder of George Tiller, and we categorically condemn the act of vigilantism and violence that took his life. America has from its foundation respected the rule of law, by which every citizen is guaranteed life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Those constitutional rights are forfeited only when crimes have been committed, and the perpetrator is charged and found guilty by a jury of his or her peers in a court of law.”

“Tiller recently faced serious charges related to the killing of babies in violation of the law, by the most grotesque procedures administered without anesthetics or compassion. We profoundly regretted the outcome of his legal case, believing the doctor had the blood of countless babies on his hands. Nevertheless, he was acquitted by the court and declared “not guilty” in the eyes of the law. That is our system, and we honor it.”

“Our condolences are extended to the Tiller family. The person or persons responsible for his death should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

Yes, because murder is always a wrong moral choice.

But the Tiller’s death should also be cause for us as a nation to carefully examine this whole area of “life” and what it means to commit murder. The US Constitution, based on Christian and biblical precedents, gives us Americans a God-given “right to life.” The current laws of the United States do not recognize that right because to accommodate the excesses of the 60s sexual revolution, we invented a “right to choose” to get rid of the unpleasant consequences of immorality. We deceptively re-defined “life” in 1972, allowing us as a nation to callously reject thousands of years of civilized behavior in order to kill our children.

We enshrined “choice” as the new morality. All of a sudden it was “good” to choose. It didn’t matter what the choice was, which in our case, was murdering forty-five million tiny fellow Americans over the past thirty-seven years.

What a ridiculous (or should we say satanic?) idea. If we’d thought about it honestly, for even a moment, we would have come to the conclusion that choice is not moral–it is neutral at best. You can choose bad or you can choose good. You can choose wisely, or you can choose evil.  You can choose life for a human being or you can choose to kill that human being. There’s nothing moral about being pro-choice. It all depends of what choice you make.

Scott Roeder made a wrong choice in killing George Tiller. Murder is always a wrong choice.

And though the laws of America are currently skewed to cover up for our sexual sins, there is a higher law that says that what George Tiller did for a living was wrong. It was a wrong choice to kill thousands of young lives who didn’t deserve to die. Even if George Tiller had lived to old age, died, and then stood before God in judgment, the righteous verdict of heaven would have then condemned him as a murderer.

Murder is always a wrong moral choice. And God will hold us all responsible for the choices that we have made (Look at Hebrews 9:27 for that sobering reality.)

And that brings us to the true state of America in 2009. On the one hand we are rightly out-raged over the murder of George Tiller. Yet, on the other hand we are still in denial about the one million children we are murdering every year under the false and deceptive labeling of choice.

We, too, are murderers. In fact, we are mass murderers on a genocidal level equal to the likes of Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse Tung. That the human beings we killed were smaller doesn’t make any difference. From the moment of conception they were separate human souls who deserved the right to live. Just like George Tiller. Just like you and me.

I’m thankful that America is finally waking up to the reality of our greatest national sin. For the first time in recent memory, Americans are now profess to be pro-life by a 52% to 44% margin (May 2009 Gallup Poll). We’re getting it–and real  change may be on the horizon.

Wouldn’t it be ironic if the murder of America’s most infamous baby killer was used by God to bring us back to the truth.

What is the truth? Murder is always a wrong moral choice.

Getting the law wrong for three decades doesn’t alter that fact.